PRENTISS

Recycling is Sexy

Recycling is sexy. Those of you who know me at all understand just how hot I think it is when I see someone tossing their empty Odwalla bottle in the right bin. You know the way I drool when someone has a reusable coffee cup. And you know how I feel about boys in tee shirts with the recycling symbol on them. Those three little arrows, following each other around in a circle, holding onto each others tails and looking so pleasantly involved in their ongoing cycle…

In fact, there is something hot about all forms of environmental consciousness. Someone buying a head of organic lettuce is automatically super fresh. Someone who rides a bike can really rattle my chain and get my wheels turning. A boy with a Buy Fresh Buy Local sticker on that bike…now there’s someone who can stick around. Enough with these bad/amazingly hilarious puns.

Now this all might stem from the fact that I come from Santa Cruz, California and have parents who tend to worm boxes and attend farmer’s markets. Or maybe I just love scruffy facial hair. Either way, someone who cares about their personal impact on this planet is alright with me.

Here’s something that’s NOT sexy. PLASTIC BAGS. Number one biggest turn off: a dude buying one solitary steak (not to mention, he’s eating alone) that is prepackaged in one of those depressing Styrofoam boats with the plastic stretched too tightly over it and the picture of the cartoon cow, laughing, glued to the plastic…and then the grocer hands him a PLASTIC BAG! And the boy with the solitary steak TAKES THE PLASTIC BAG! And the boy with the solitary steak DOESN’T EVEN THINK TWICE! Oh goodness, I think when I see this. This is not a marketable market boy.

You see, plastic is made of polyethylene (polyethylene=not sexy) which takes up to 1,000 years to decompose at the dump (dump=not sexy). Americans (not sexy) use 380 billion bags a year and only recycle .6% of them (.6 percent of anything=not sexy). Plastic bags are usually used for only 15 minutes (anything that lasts only 15 minutes=not sexy) before they are thrown into the trash or littered onto the street (litter=not sexy). Then they harm sea life (suffocated squid=not sexy) and strangle seagulls (dead seagulls=not sexy); there was even one sea creature, dissected by some darling Dutchmen, who had ingested 1,603 pieces of plastic in his short sea life: NOT SEXY!

Plastic bags, as I am proving to you, have NO SEX APPEAL.

People all over the world are starting to see what a turn off plastic bags can be. Australia (and you KNOW how hot Aussies are) are selling “green bags” at most stores (color-coded for each store) to discourage plastic bag use. Most European countries charge for plastic bags at markets, pushing people to BYOB (Bring Your Own Backpack). In Bhutan, king Jigme Singye Wangchuck has banned plastic bags completely (along with MTV and tobacco) on grounds that they lower the Gross National Happiness of the country (he made up this term and it is pretty awesome). And we all know about San Francisco’s infamous blow off of the plastic bag this last year…

This is all well and good. But Americans (not sexy) are still (alongside Europe) using and wasting over 80 percent of the world’s plastic bags. (We apparently do not get sex appeal memos until a few years too late. I mean we JUST figured out that mullets were back like, a year ago.) So how do we, the twenty-somethings of the Green-Is-The-New-Black era do to fight off the red flag that is the plastic bag? How do we change our ways to look SEXY AT THE SUPERMARKET?!

I’ll tell you what to do: use a reusable shopping bag. Use a BAGGU reusable shopping bag. Why? Because not only do I work for Baggu (I swear they did not pay me to write this) and use them every day myself, but I personally find them to be the sexiest of all shopping bags on the market. They are made of ripstop nylon. They come in radical colors. They fold up into a tiny pouch. They get you dates.

www.baggubag.com

Seriously

The other night, while acting as wing-woman for a blonder, cuter friend (not that she needed me, her blue eyes were doing quite good work for her), the boy she was working on suddenly turned to me. “You’re so serious!” he said, knotting his eyebrows, maybe in genuine concern or perhaps mocking my own furrowed brow. I had not meant to or known that I was acting or looking serious, and I immediately took offense. Was it my less high-lighted, newly central-parted hair that was doing it? The natural posture of my face (tight lips, a worried forehead)? My outfit: boyish pants, a grayish top, nothing flashy, as had been my M.O. lately? Was it in contrast to my buoyant, fresh-faced friend that I appeared so stern? Or was I actually, as this random tall man-boy proclaimed, so serious?

Now serious is something I have always taken seriously, mostly because of the worry that I, as a woman-person, might not be taken as such. (Seriously, that is.) For as long as I can remember I have been concerned that because I am a) a girl and b) blonde and c) fun I may be dismissed as a) dumb or b) ditzy or c) casual. Yes, casual, the opposite of serious, was something that have I dreaded as a label. But then why was I so offended when being called serious by the man I was wing-manning for? Wasn’t it what I had wanted? Wasn’t seriousness, after all, the female goal of the century? Did it make sense, as displayed by so many woman writers or intellectuals, that if we want to be taken seriously we should behave seriously?

I have the good fortune to be able to listen to the radio while I do my editing at work. I have been listening to everything from news shows to science podcasts to punk music to audio interviews (this is all part of my seriousness campaign: I’ll be able to site these small bits of knowledge in casual conversation later). Many of the interviews I have listened to have been with women writers, as I look to them for bits of writing life wise-ness, hoping, by some osmosis, that I will inherit a little bit of their vigor and intelligence by listening to them. What I have found is a serious conundrum: many women writers, the ones I love at least, sound imposingly, almost forbiddingly serious. Joan Didion speaks as if she’s got nails in her mouth, Lydia Davis sounds like she could use a cup of coffee, and Mary Gaitskill just seems mean. Why do these great women, whose voices sound so poignant on the page, have this commonly strained voice, this only occasional (and also strained) laughter, and a tone that says: don’t mess with me, I’m smart as a whip and tough as my thickest hard-back volume?

In order to be taken seriously, that’s why. Not that this is a bad thing: the tough, serious woman showing the world that she’s a force to be reckoned with. But it sure doesn’t make you wanna invite them to your birthday party or take them out for a Cosmopolitan. They might scare you, intimidate you, or worse, let down their guard and show you that they’re just as goofy as you are when you get them alone. Either way, my question remains: is it this sense of seriousness that has afforded these women the respect of literary and intellectual communities? And if so, will I need to tighten my mouth a bit more, socialize a little bit less, stay inside a little bit more, smile a little bit less, read a little bit more, talk a little bit less, to afford it for myself? In other words, can I still laugh a lot and still be serious? Let’s hope so, ‘cause its about to be my birthday and I want to have some serious fun.

On Coffee & Kentridge

I am obsessed with William Kentridge — because William Kentridge is obsessed with coffee. He hasn’t told me this directly, but it comes through in his art work. His espresso cup is his telescope, for example, and then his mocha machine his rocket ship. His saucer is his moon. He uses the word percolate to talk about the formation of ideas. Then he called the blank page an antagonist, and I knew we were kindred. More than kindred: I wanted to have his babies. Our babies would have the best ideas, I thought while sipping on my own soy latte on a particularly good feeling morning when the wind was fretting about something but not taking it out on me. I was in the back yard of a good café and I let the fantasy have its way with me. My Kentridge babies would be cultured and long-nosed and fat. They would be the protagonists in the minimalist theater that was the blank page of our lives. They would be fed their milk in espresso cups, have mobiles made of negative space, clothes of cut up paper. My Kentridge babies, little fragments of new narrative, would percolate their way through the world.

It turned out that this good feeling morning was a morning of good ideas. My next idea, after the one about me and Kentridge producing offspring, was to try to remember every cup of coffee I had consumed in my entire life. Good idea, I thought to myself, because when I was drinking coffee in a back garden somewhere and the sun was smooching on me and the wind was feeling me up, I always thought my ideas were good.

I scribbled some things in my Moleskin. I wrote a note to Piero, because Piero gave me my first cup of coffee ever. Everyone was named Piero in those days, but this Piero was special because he gave me my first. I remembered the class rooms with columns, the chandeliers, the espresso makers fritzing in the marble hallways. Thanks, Piero, I wrote, you gave me my first. Thanks Piero, you got me hooked. You threw out a fishline and the bait was this tiny espresso cup and then I was at your feet each morning, begging for more. The second cup of coffee was my best friend’s first cup, and I did like a momma bird does: put some in my mouth and gave it to the best friend like I was spitting up. Yum, she said. Super good first sip. I was proud to have shared something because sharing something is always honorable and sharing something with a best friend means love.

The third cup was with Sarah at one of those classy places where they make a leaf in your drink with the milk foam. This was when we were learning the hierarchy of cafes and also the hierarchy of words. And Sarah told me: lets do the kind of work that is not for work work but for lungs work — and she was so refreshingly sincere that the coffee tasted smoother and more confident. The fourth and fifth and sixth cups were with my father and those cups were all about patience and learning to draw. And the million cups with my mother were so bright and agro I felt like the world was growing inside of me and then crumbling because I wanted so much of it and the cups with my sisters were charged with the electrical current that runs between bodies that know each other and the year’s worth of cups with Forrest were paired with the fireworks of new love and those cups rocket-shipped to the heart.

After that there were too many cups to count. At the café table, my mind spiraled outward and I closed my Moleskin; I was disgusted with my inability to sufficiently record my thoughts in words. If I could bottle all the coffees I’ve ever had into one bottle, I thought, that bottle would have a bottleneck the size of an ancient sea. And convening at that bottleneck would be all the people I had ever drank coffee with, sitting in rowboats painted green or orange, taking sips from ceramic cups of all sizes. The Italians would be there with their pinkies in the air; their cups so small you feared they finish them too fast, that you wouldn’t have enough time to talk. The Argentines would be there, trying to be like the Italians but, insecure, would have accidentally let the water run too long through their coffee grinds and ended up with a thin, bitter liquid that they’d abandon for an equally thin pastry shaped like a crescent moon. The Chileans would be there with their Nescafe and the Mexicans with their café con leche and the French with their French press and the Turkish with all that shit in their teeth from the grime of the grinds, which was actually quite charming, considering they were used to it. Then there would be my American friends, trying to steady themselves in their rickety boats, taking notes about the exotic nature of said rickety boats in their own Moleskins while sipping on grande extra hot things that cost four ninety five because of the possibility that they were organic.

You see, I drink coffee to see the whole world drinking coffee: to remember that we are all in something together. Because upon the first sip — we’re all equals. We’re all tap dancing with the jitters, we’ve each unfolded our newspaper like a map, and we’re ready to zoom around a bit, see who else is up at this hour, check out each other’s brews. But here’s the catch: without the coffee you can’t see all the others drinking coffee, because the only way you can know that the whole world is having a cup, the only possible way you can begin to see something that huge, that broad, that universal, the only way you can turn your sympathy into empathy and your microcosm into a macro one, is with the fantastic mental surge that comes with coffee, that cosmic caffeinated moment where the firsts and lasts come together, where the bottleneck of the ancient sea breaks and the rowboats are sailing in unison gracefully, where your coffee cup morphs into a beating heart and your saucer is the same as a moon, where all the Pieros bleed into one and all the newspaper maps lead to the same place, and I’m not trying to get all fair trade on you now but where the importance of process and justice begins to matter and you see it mattering because in your big caffeinated moment you’re understanding where that coffee came from, all those ethical/moral/socially responsible issues like how much did that coffee picker make off your cup and it was probably not enough and you will try to fix this through your creative practice and through your own awareness and avid attention…

but then with the fade of the jolt of the caffeinated frenzy you drop back into your spot at this one particular round table at this one particular café. Kentridge, you remember, said that although he had hoped to escape the confines of his studio through the telescope of his espresso cup, he had actually ended up still stuck inside it, looking out through the window of the rocket ship, staring at a sheet of black paper pinned to the studio wall.

In the end, Kentridge and I are cuddling on a Sunday morning, waking up from our respective percolating dreams. He sighs, turning away from me sadly. I don’t deserve to be an artist, he says to the universe, because everything he says is to the universe. I am saddened by his lack of confidence, because nothing is sadder than a lack of confidence in someone you love. But then I remember something hopeful. Then lets drink coffee, I whisper into his big old ear, knowing he will understand what I mean to say, which is that the coffee is the same as art.

Italy, Revisted

I knew a real Italian once. He was “real” in my book because he embodied all of the things I had heard about Italians: his hair was a slick tarmac of black waves, his hand gestures were violent, his name was Gastone, he cheated on his wife and had a baby with his mistress. I felt proud to have known him; it is rare that one gets to know a figure who so perfectly personifies a stereotype.

It wasn’t really Gastone who I knew, though. I am exaggerating for selfish reasons, to seem worldly in my encounter with that perfect machismo, or to make something funny out of something that, in fact, was not. Who I really knew was Flavia Russo, Gastone’s ex-wife. I took care of Flavia’s children and lived with her in her house at 10 Via Paglietta, close to the city gates; the walls were blanketed in ivy and by the time I moved in Gastone had already gone.

I did not know what I was getting into when I moved into Flavia’s house that September. I was to occupy the library, a place of small dimensions, full of books on communism and white elephants, photographs of past happiness, of trips to Vietnam and New York, framed college degrees, a pull-out bed. The ceiling was a fresco of a lonely angel holding a winged child, looking downward onto the bed where I slept. Later I would think: Flavia, is that you?

Flavia was like a light bulb: she was very small but the impact she had on a room was big. She had done things differently than most Italian women in that she had divorced her husband for cheating on her. She was a doer and a mover. She had adopted her two children from Vietnam. When she cooked she had eight arms. She collected art and she cried when she felt like crying. Her hair was a triangular sponge of curls, died blonde, to give her that effect of some over-exposed, frazzled form of light.

Living with Italians. There are things you expect: the shiny hexagonal espresso chambers, the line-drying, the obsessive intricacies of pasta cooking. What I hadn’t expected: the emotions, which flew around Flavia’s house like kites and daggers, and the fact that Italians were, in fact, real people. In other words, this was not a dollhouse, this was life. Flavia flung her emotions wildly; she was in a pillow fight with intangible things.

My emotions were there too, hiding in the fireplace or between the houseplants, taking refuge in the molding that lined the fresco on my ceiling. Unable to compete with those of a post-divorce, mid mid-life crisis single mother, my own emotions waited patiently, like humble turtles, in the wings.

Flavia said: I will make you some chamomile tea. She said: He is a bastard. She said: Life is sad, so you have to let yourself be sad. She said: Why do you wear thong underwear? She said: Why do you take such long showers?

What a mother Flavia was! When we would drink chamomile tea together on her white couch I would tell her all of the things that were on my mind. There are things you do not expect: being understood is one of those things.

Flavia said: I could not have children. She said: In Vietnam there are so many abused children, forgotten children. She said: I would not have adopted them if I had known he would leave me. She said: That bastard. She said: Why haven’t you read Dante yet?

When Gastone would come to pick up the children, the house smelled like a slaughterhouse. Gastone was a big bull; Flavia used collected silence as a cleaver. Gastone was a butcher and Flavia was a weak calf. I was an onlooker, a buyer of meat, meant to regulate and to barter, meant to take whatever was chopped up home with me, wrapped tightly in white paper and plastic. When Gastone would leave there would be blood on the floor, feathers in the air, some empty silence that meant animals had died.

Traveling puts you out of your comfort zone.

I played dress up with the kids. Bruna and Thao. They were both nine and both from the same region in Vietnam. They were not real sisters. Flavia and Gastone had adopted them just weeks after they were born. Thao had been bruised and cut when they had found her; now she had learning disabilities, a hard time saying certain words. Bruna was smart as an owl and seemed to have such instincts. We are all going to die some day, said Bruna, aren’t we? Vietnam was beautiful, according to Flavia. What a poor place, she said. What a sad place.

Before I moved to Bologna I had certain ideas about what I would find there. I thought about the clothes people would be wearing there and the way the arches of the buildings would look through a camera lens. I had read that the city was built of red bricks and imagined what it would look like from above: a crimson lake, deep in the middle and shallow towards the edges where the buildings thinned out. When you think of a place before you go there it is like thinking of a library void of books: you think in terms of structure. People make up places. People change places.

People change.

Gastone had left an entire closet full of clothes at Flavia’s house: designer suits, mostly, and crisp Armani shirts, pressed. They were covered in plastic. They hung like bodies. When Gastone came to pick the suits up it was a cold night. When Gastone left with the suits Flavia ran to the window, peeked through the window shade, and watched as Gastone got into his pregnant lover’s car. Che palle! Flavia screamed. What balls!

When Flavia cooked she had eight arms. Two were doing the pasta and two were doing the meat. The other four did the chopping and the desserts. She never wanted help. When I tried to help her she shooed me away with one of the many arms. A lot of women friends would come for dinner. We would have many grapes and cheeses and hoards of wine. Angela from upstairs would come. Giuliana would come. They would make her feel good for a while, but women can only make you feel so good.

What I remember most about being in Italy was how lonely it was. It wasn’t just me, either. It wasn’t that I didn’t have any friends. Maybe it was the red brick, the way it fooled you, how you thought it would be warm because of its color but upon touching it you were left cold. Or the way you could smell defeat - the declines, lost battles, smoke from dropped bombs – rising from the ground when you went walking, looking for a bottle of wine at midnight. Or perhaps it was just the air there, the way the particles were arranged, that made it feel like you were inhaling sand when you breathed, or like all birds had flown.

In November I got the stomach flu from a baked pumpkin I ate at the market on Via Santo Stefano; the pumpkin was orange and beautiful but made my stomach turn ugly and black. I could not leave my bed in Flavia’s library for days on end, except for the toilet. I called the American doctor who sat on the edge of my bed like a father and wrote me a prescription; his white hair made me miss home. I left the house to pick up the prescription but on the way I vomited in an alleyway and defecated in my pants. I had to throw my pants in the dumpster, pull my sweater down over my knees. Where was my mother?

Bruna and Thao drew pictures of me. In Bruna’s picture I was very big and in Thao’s picture I was very small. They asked me: what does your sister look like? I told them she had dark hair, like theirs, which excited them. They asked me: Do you miss her? Of course, I told them. They asked me: Who’s drawing do you like better? What’s your favorite kind of music? Why do grandparents die? Why do you wear thong underwear? None of these questions were so easy to answer. I was very big and also very small.

Gastone’s face like a bull haunted me. Flavia’s screams sounded like sirens. I was glad the suits in the closet were gone. But what was she left with? It seemed to me that Gastone was every man along with being every Italian.

I have been to many sad places, but none quite like Bologna, where the city’s sadness seems to be as ancient and thick as the bricks it is built of. It was a place where even festivals seemed sad; parades seemed to mourn rather than celebrate, Christmas seemed laced with lament. Happy fruit is dreary under such pressure. Statues are angry history. In the winter we were all inside, in the summer we left for the shore. In between we celebrated the temperate weather but since celebrating wasn’t joyful even the spring seemed sad. Old dust plagued even those of us who were new.

I understand, Flavia said to me when I told her I was moving out of her house. And she did understand. She understood that Americans were always trying to be comfortable.

I had imagined success in the form of stereotypes. I had imagined returning with stories of cigarettes and vineyards, greased-up men hollering, the fashion! I wrote postcards addressed to California addressing the beauty of the laundry hanging from the windows, the richness of the espresso here, the wine! To succeed was to love Italy – what a rich place! – and to fail was to let yourself become burdened by it.

Success leads to comfort as we know it.

Gastone was a prop, was he not? And Flavia a metaphor? This was not real life, but rather a dramatic screenplay strewn with life lessons, a cooking class, a foreign film without subtitles. How easy to break free of such melancholy, for Flavia’s wounded house was not my house at all, nor were her wounds mine to heal.

Comfort means freeing yourself from things that make you uncomfortable.

My success took simple form: the year had passed. And failure happened; my emotions are still somewhere in Flavia’s chimney or biting at the roots of her houseplants. In some sense, I have not left her house at all, nor freed myself from what slaughters plagued us there. I am hoping that Flavia does not find me. She has enough to deal with as it is: she must behave as a light bulb, a kite, a cleaver, a mother with eight arms.

Ropa Tipica

In Guatemala, traditional clothing is still worn by most of the local women. These standard outfits, called Ropa Tipica, consist of an insanely intricate, embroidered blouse, tucked uncomfortably into a thick, high-waisted skirt, constructed by wrapping a piece of patterned fabric around the waist like a roll of paper towels. This is cinched tightly at the top with a colorfully embroidered belt. None of this matches, by the way, and the overall effect, although quite elaborate, can make the eyes dizzy. (In America we are taught that too many clashing visuals at once is bad form, that our color palates should be carefully coordinated, and that we must never, under any circumstances, wear six different patterns at the same time.)

Despite my personal qualms with the Guatemalan aesthetic (those patterns make me think of the nineties, by the way, when MC hammer may or may not have rocked Guatemalan print baggies while he boogied) there is something that I love about the way Guatemalans wear their clothing. Here, clothing is not used to distinguish oneself from the group (we love to do this in the States with bold “one of a kind” fashion statements) but rather to fit people into a whole. Each village in Guatemala, however small or remote, however poor, produces and wears their own form of “Ropa Tipica.” This means that wherever a woman goes, she will stand out not as an individual but rather as a member of her village, a part of a place.

Other women will notice and appreciate the varied forms of Ropa Tipica rather than judge the wearer of it (as we may judge the wearer of flared jeans in a moment of skinnies, or vice versa), and will take note of the technique that they use for embroidery up on the hill, or the way they tie their hair in the capital. “Ahh,” one will whisper to another, “she must come from San Pedro. That is the embroidery they use on that side of the lake!” And she will feel confident that she has recognized the detailing on the sleeve to correctly discern where this woman hails from. This making and wearing and recognizing of clothing is quite endearing in its association with its sense of pride and place.

I understand that in certain American cities there are “uniforms” that characterize that city’s residents, much like the traditional garb of the Guatemalans. In New York last year it was mandatory to wear flat shoes, skinny pants, and an ironic accessory. Black was never out, pink was never in, and Chuck Taylors refused to become uncool. In California they were still getting away with flip flops and Volcom cargo shorts, and the Californian could be spotted as a West Coaster as soon as he set foot in any other state. In Ohio I am quite positive that they have not moved away from Sketchers and Ohio State hoodies, which sucks for them but makes them recognizable nonetheless. Our identities, therefore, can be linked to our place of residence through our clothing, but there is a fundamental difference in how we Americans put ourselves together than those in many other cultures: this is about America’s obsession with choice and tendency towards change.

What is different about our “uniforms” is their lack of traditional value, which decreases their level authenticity, therefore decreasing the confidence of the wearer incrementally. We are allowed to and expected to choose what we wear each day, and this choice is yet another of our expressions of “self”and “individuality”. Yet this choice can be confusing and overwhelming, which creates a sense of doubt in our fashionable expressions. Because of this we move in and out of fashion crazes, we “fall in love!” with shoulder pads or spatter paint, we detest or adore denim (depending on the decade), we love bangs or we love braids or we love “back to basics”  or nautical or lumberjack plaid. We declare war on certain waistlines and wearing white at certain times of year. We let everyone know what is “in”and what is “out”, making hasty and definitive statements that regulate what’s in our closets. Our overall aesthetic, therefore, is always changing, always fleeting, and this means our choices are always changing.

We go to all ends to break traditional clothing molds rather than keep them, wearing whatever we can to set us apart, to be different from our previous generations, to define ourselves and our status and our group of peers. When we do wear relics of the past we do so with a sense of irony or drama, a “throwback” if you will, which pokes fun of and relishes in decades past simultaneously. (The eighties, for example, are always “coming back” in the form of leggings or side ponytails, and the fifties are resurfacing in the waistline and the cardigan.) The casting off of tradition is as important to Americans as keeping it is to Guatemalans.

When we try to be cool in Guatemala it is almost laughable. The American Apparel tee is just a tee shirt here, and no one knows that it has a definable weight on the coolness scale in the States. The ironic throwback is misunderstood and misread here; a shirt that reads “Fun in the Sun,´88” may be mistaken for summer camp that you ACTUALLY attended in Florida Beach, rather than some thrift store score that people in America would understand was a real gem. Stylish haircuts are absurd, and big sunglasses are a joke. There is really no point then, in putting anyone on by putting things on. Living out of a backpack with one pair of jeans is probably a good thing.

This doesn’t mean I don’t miss my dresses though, hanging in a row in my old closet, collecting dust there, and gradually becoming uncool.